Searching…
In consultation with the ACL exec, ACL 2023 expands the mandatory Responsible NLP Checklist developed at NAACL 2022 by one more question concerning the use of writing assistants. If such tools were used in any way, th...
It contains instructions for using the LaTeX style file for ACL 2023. The document itself conforms to its own specifications, and is, therefore, an example of what your manuscript should look like.
To be as open as possible, below we have written answers to all of the questions submitted online and asked in person. In some cases, we have grouped together related questions.
We present analysis of the factors affecting peer review, identify the most problematic issues that the authors complained about, and provide suggestions for the future chairs.
We present analysis of the factors affecting peer review, identify the most problematic issues that the authors complained about, and provide suggestions for the future chairs.
I think some tutorials are out there that walk through how author responses are used and give more guidance—e.g., that the author response should be respectful of reviewers' efforts and aim to provide helpful clarific...
The authors can then use the “response to chairs” box in the author response form to report the type of the issue and explain your rationale to the chairs. This mechanism should only be used for serious issues.
Visit the webpage of the official call for papers and please read the author information page, as well as the author checklist for submissions. Please read the reviewer information page. Also please read the reviewer ...
As a step in that direction, ACL’23 makes its peer review report public and an official part of the conference proceedings, complementing the introduction and other administrative materials.
Abstract This document is a supplement to the general instructions for *ACL authors. It contains in-structions for using the LATEX style file for ACL 2023. The document itself conforms to its own specifications, and i...
